Product Hypothesis Canvas
We are increasingly shifting from projects centered on the demands of customers or users to projects focused on product hypotheses.
There are several reasons for this.
On the one hand, we are expected to implement new functions within increasingly shorter deadlines. That’s because the competition is getting fiercer, and the world, thanks to modern technology, keeps speeding up and getting more complex.
On the other hand, having more diverse groups of users means facing more diverse needs. We are moving at full speed towards an entirely customizable world. And this creates an even greater demand for instantaneous product adjustments.
If “demands” require implementation, then “hypotheses,” above all, need to be tested. But before that, the hypotheses must be coherently articulated. Which is not always as easy as we would have wanted.
We believe that the more coherent the hypothesis, the more fruitful testing it will be. Testing in this sense covers not just the verification of the actual hypothesis, but also any possible insights that may be gathered in the process. To structure and simplify the process of articulating your hypothesis, we have singled out the following questions, which you can answer sequentially.
The Product Hypothesis Canvas helps you create more effective hypotheses. Keep in mind that the canvas does not do the work for you; it simply helps you focus on the task at hand and reach a more effective solution.
The steps for filling out the Product Hypothesis Canvas
1. We believe that…
Here, we describe what we plan to develop.
2. For (whom)…
In this block, we define our target audience and, if required, evaluate its role in our project.This step is very important, as it will later help us rank our hypotheses by their relevance to our project. Sometimes, project team members become utterly seduced by an interesting idea, and end up forgetting that it is only applicable to a few isolated cases.In fact, if the author is unable to coherently explain whom their hypothesis is going to benefit, it’s very likely that they are just indulging in random guesswork. That is like when a pool player breaks with a powerful strike, hoping to pocket a ball at random. In the same way, product managers and designers generate hypotheses with no connection to the users, hoping that at least someone is going to be interested. Be really careful with such hypotheses; it may be worth the time to think about them in greater detail.
3. To achieve…
It is also important to determine what kind of result we are expecting from our experiment. Moreover, the result should preferably be measurable in specific terms. Don’t write, “We must do better!” It’s better to express your expectations like, “We must improve [product] by 5%.”Depending on the hypothesis, we may have different expectations for short-term and long-term results. Many people prefer to focus on short-term results and avoid working with hypotheses that have more far-reaching goals. But when we create our hypothesis, we must be aware of how long it will take to test it: a day, a week, a month, or maybe even longer. With that in mind, we will later be able to plan a backlog of our experiment.
4. How do we measure this?
The ability to measure the results is the key parameter for testing product hypotheses. While we already mentioned what we are going to measure in the previous step, here we describe the kinds of tools we are going to use for this. What signals will indicate that the opportunity we have created is impactful? Which key performance indicators (qualitative or quantitative) are we going to measure to prove our experiment was successful?
5. Impact, positive or negative
We have introduced this block in case we want to approach our hypothesis as something beyond a single objective. Filling it in is not mandatory.In some cases, the introduction of a certain function has a negative impact on other parameters within the system. For example, we add an extensive, informative presentationto our home page, hoping to increase user engagement. However, the presentation impacts the page’s loading speed, which, contrary to our intent, increases the bounce rate, potentially reducing engagement. In this specific case, the higher bounce rate is probably not caused by the functionality itself but by its bulkiness and poor implementation.
This template was created by Podluzny.
Get started with this template right now.
The Product Hunt
Works best for:
Product Management, Planning
The Product Hunt template provides a platform for collecting and prioritizing product ideas. By allowing teams to submit, review, and vote on ideas, this template fosters a culture of innovation and collaboration. With features for categorizing ideas, tracking progress, and celebrating successes, it promotes transparency and engagement across teams. This template serves as a central hub for capturing and nurturing innovative ideas, driving continuous improvement and product innovation.
Lean Inception Workshop
Works best for:
Agile, Lean Methodology
The Lean Inception Workshop streamlines project kickoff by aligning teams on goals, scope, and priorities. It leverages Lean principles to eliminate waste and maximize value, guiding exercises to define user personas, map user journeys, and prioritize features. By fostering cross-functional collaboration and customer-centric thinking, this template accelerates project initiation and ensures alignment between stakeholders, empowering teams to deliver customer value faster.
Team Meeting Agenda Template
Works best for:
Documentation, Team Meetings, Workshops
Making the time for your team is important to help you to make decisions, align on priorities, and move in the same direction together. Team meeting agendas help add a schedule and structure to your allocated time slot when you need to share information and collaborate with your team. They also allow your team to agree on goals, talking points, action items, and who will lead the next steps. Uninterrupted team meeting time with an agenda can help your team review progress against OKRs, share updates, discuss roadblocks, and brainstorm ideas.
Fishbone Diagram for Service Improvement
Works best for:
Fishbone diagram
The Basic Fishbone Diagram, also known as the Ishikawa or cause-and-effect diagram, is a powerful tool for identifying the root causes of problems. Use this template to systematically explore and document potential causes of an issue, categorizing them into key areas such as people, processes, equipment, and materials. This visual approach helps teams collaborate on problem-solving, ensuring all factors are considered and addressed effectively.
Starfish Retrospective
Works best for:
Retrospectives, Agile Methodology, Meetings
The Starfish Retrospective template offers a structured approach to retrospectives using the metaphor of a starfish. It provides elements for identifying what to start, stop, continue, do more of, and do less of. This template enables teams to reflect on past iterations, identify actionable insights, and prioritize improvements. By promoting clarity and focus, the Starfish Retrospective empowers teams to drive meaningful change and continuous improvement effectively.
Fishbone RCA
Works best for:
Problem solving, Strategy
Use the Fishbone RCA template to conduct a thorough root cause analysis (RCA) for any problem. This template helps you break down complex issues into manageable categories, enabling you to identify the underlying causes. It's an effective tool for improving processes, solving problems, and preventing future issues.