Blameless postmortem canvas
Discover how Byron Torres does Blameless postmortem canvas in Miro.
Follow this process means that engineers whose actions have contributed to an accident can give a detailed account of:
what actions they took at what time,
what effects they observed,
expectations they had,
assumptions they had made,
their understanding of timeline of events as they occurred.
and that they can give this detailed account without fear of punishment or retribution.
The Blameless postmortem includes the following sections
Step 1: Summary (pre-fill ahead of the meeting)
A high-level summary of the issue, focusing on what is known at this point and what the impact to the customer was. Keep this to a sentence or two.
Step 2: Rough Timeline (pre-fill ahead of the meeting)
A rough timeline of the issue. Depending on how fast-moving the issue was, this timeline could span a few minutes to a few hours to a few days. If your primary focus is on improving the team’s response times during emergencies, you’ll want this down to the second.
As you capture the timeline, be sure to include:
When the issue was reported and by whom/what process
What actions were taken
When communication was made into and out of the team
Remediation Ideas
When you meet to discuss the issue, invite everyone who worked the issue. This includes the production support team as well as the customer support team members that may have been involved.
Review the summary, review the time line and add any missing parts, then move into the remediation ideas.
These questions are formulated to help the team take ownership of the problem. There are some issues that feel like they are outside of the team’s control (data center loses power, etc). But even in events like those, the team can still improve their reaction to the disaster.
Step 3: Detect – How do we detect this problem or a problem like this sooner?
Assume this problem or a problem very much like it will happen again. How can the support team detect this problem faster and find it before a customer does?
Step 4: React – How do we improve our reaction to issues like these?
Assume the issue is reported. How quick was the reaction? Were minutes lost while people were sending emails around trying to get someone to look at the problem?
The next time this issue happens, how can the team react more quickly or in a more organized fashion?
Step 5: Quick Fix – How do we stop the bleeding faster?
When this happens again, is there a ready workaround that we can provide the customer to reduce the impact of the problem?
If this is something that gets worse over time (like a DDOS attack) do we have a quick way to close the flood gates while we figure out the root cause?
Step 6: Prevent – How do we prevent or reduce the impact of issues like in the future?
This is often the only question teams ask in a postmortem. It is an important question and you should spend a lot of time here. However, if you limit yourself to asking only how to prevent an issue, it lets you not take any responsibility for the things within your control (like how you detect, react or quick fix an issue).
As you brainstorm ideas, don’t limit yourself to technical fixes. Better monitoring, better communication paths, better training, making sure the people in customer support know the people in production support by name, etc.
Step 7: Other Areas of Risk – What other areas share this same vulnerability?
Every issue is a hint at where your system is weak. Odds are, for each issue you find, there are dozens lurking in the shadows, yet to be found.
Kind of like if you see a mouse in your kitchen. You don’t have a “mouse” problem, you’ve got a “mice” problem.
There are likely other parts of the system that share the same design assumptions or in some cases the same code (not that anyone would ever copy/paste code).
Spend a few minutes brainstorming for other places that are vulnerable in a similar way.
When teams are stressed and overworked, they will skip this step. I find that this is the most important question to ask to get the team into a proactive mindset and to reduce the occurrence of issues in the future.
Step 8: Next Steps (Actions)
After you’ve identified all the possible things you can do to improve how issues are detected, reacted to, quick fixed and prevented…and you’ve found the other areas of your application that need attention…move on to deciding which actions to take.
The way you prioritize these is up to you. But I do have a few pieces of advice.
Get a name and a date on each one you plan to action before you leave the meeting
If someone in the meeting is passionate about taking one of the actions, encourage them to, even if you think it might not be the most important thing to fix
Names and Dates
Generally, I’ve found that teams enjoy this exercise (provided you can create a blameless environment for the meeting). They like dissecting the problem and brainstorming solutions. However, everyone feels busy and overworked. Unless this meeting wraps with owners and dates next to the things that need to be done, the greatest likelihood is that none of the improvements will happen.
What will happen is that 3 weeks from now when the same problem occurs on production (but this time in a bigger way) someone will say, “oh yeah, we talked about fixing that.” Not a great place to be.
To combat that, simply ensure that there is a name and date next to each action that the group wants to take.
This template was created by Byron Torres.
Get started with this template right now.
Lean Inception
Works best for:
Agile, Meetings
Lean Inception is a collaborative workshop for aligning teams on project goals and scope. It provides a structured framework for defining the product vision, user personas, and feature prioritization. This template enables cross-functional teams to collaborate, validate assumptions, and establish a shared understanding of the project vision and objectives. By promoting early alignment and customer-centric thinking, Lean Inception empowers teams to kickstart projects with clarity and purpose, driving efficiency and innovation from the outset.
FMEA Analysis Template
Works best for:
Agile Methodology, Strategic Planning, Software Development
When you’re building a business or running a team, risk comes with the territory. You can’t eliminate it. But you CAN identify it and mitigate it, to up your odds of success. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a powerful tool designed to help you manage risk and potential problems by spotting them within a process, product, or system. And you’ll spot them earlier in your process—to let you sidestep costly changes that arise late in the game or, worse, after they’ve impacted your customers and their experience.
8 Different Ways to Organize Your Backlog
Works best for:
Agile
Explore 8 different techniques for managing and prioritizing work effectively with this template. From prioritization matrices to story mapping, it offers a comprehensive overview of backlog management strategies. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each approach, teams can tailor their backlog organization to optimize workflow, empowering teams to stay organized and focused on delivering value.
Roadmap Planning Template
Works best for:
Roadmap, Agile
The Roadmap Planning Template in Miro is a dynamic tool designed to streamline the process of planning and tracking project milestones. This template is part of Miro's Intelligent Templates offering, which integrates AI, interactive widgets, and automation to enhance productivity. One key feature of this template is its real-time collaboration capability, allowing team members to work together seamlessly, regardless of their location. This feature ensures that everyone is on the same page, making it easier to assign tasks, set deadlines, and track progress effectively.
Reflection Island: End of Year Team Retro
Works best for:
Retrospectives, Agile Methodology, Meetings
The Reflection Island: End of Year Team Retro template offers a creative and themed approach to retrospectives, perfect for wrapping up the year. It provides elements for reflecting on achievements, challenges, and goals using a tropical island theme. This template enables teams to celebrate successes, learn from setbacks, and set intentions for the upcoming year in a relaxed and enjoyable atmosphere. By promoting reflection and celebration, the Reflection Island: End of Year Team Retro empowers teams to strengthen bonds, boost morale, and start the new year with renewed energy and focus effectively.
PI Planning Template
Works best for:
PI Planning, Product Management
The Miro PI Planning Template streamlines the Program Increment planning process for Agile teams. It facilitates a collaborative environment, enabling teams to efficiently align on strategies, identify dependencies, and convert decisions into actionable tasks. With features like real-time collaboration, Jira integration, and a centralized workspace, the template supports teams in enhancing efficiency, engagement, and decision-making.